Ford v. Dickey et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Davon Ford, Sr.
Defendant: Wayne Dickey, Kevin Stuart and Brazos County Detention Center
Case Number: 4:2025cv00319
Filed: January 24, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Keith P Ellison
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2025 Filing 8 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Christopher Davon Ford, Sr re: #6 Final Judgment, filed. (dah4)
March 10, 2025 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Christopher Davon Ford, Sr re: #5 Memorandum and Opinion,, filed. (dah4)
February 21, 2025 Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT. This lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on February 21, 2025. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (mmm4)
February 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Having screened the complaint, the Court DISMISSES this lawsuit WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any and all pending motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (mmm4)
February 18, 2025 Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Christopher Davon Ford, Sr re: #3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. An updated address could not be found. (gc4)
January 27, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmn4)
January 27, 2025 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4)
January 27, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4)
January 24, 2025 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Christopher Davon Ford, Sr. (bmn4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ford v. Dickey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Davon Ford, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wayne Dickey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin Stuart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brazos County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?