Davis et al v. Singh et al
| Arthur Davis and Michael Myles |
| Harjinder Singh and Shabad Transport USA, Inc |
| 4:2025cv00512 |
| February 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (hlc4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (hlc4) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 411th District Court San Jacinto County, case number CV17,924 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32884667) filed by Shabad Transport USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Index, #3 Exhibit B - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #5 Exhibit D- Certified Police Report, #6 Exhibit E - List of Counsel of Record, #7 Exhibit F - IN SOS Incorporation of Shabad Transport, #8 Exhibit G - Davis Admissions, #9 Exhibit H - Myles Admissions) (Van Cleve, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
