Amber Services NA LLC et al v. Brummett et al
| Amber Services NA LLC and Amber Mining US. LLC |
| John Brummett, Clinton Brown, Laura Hrehor, Dustin McAtee, Tom Darrow, Mark Fisher, Crypto Optimization Group, LLC, CCM Electric, LLC, Critical Coordination, LLC and 3rd Generation Engineering, Inc. |
| 4:2025cv00674 |
| February 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Setting as to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Parties notified. Motion Hearing set for 4/16/2025 at 04:00 PM in by telephone before Judge Keith P Ellison, filed. (aar4) |
| Filing 14 REPLY in Support of #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow. (Sellers, Nathan) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition to #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Amber Global Limited. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Proposed Order) (Ashby, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Amber Mining US. LLC, filed. (Ashby, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 PROPOSED ORDER re: #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed. (Sellers, Nathan) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re: #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. (Sellers, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/31/2025. (Sellers, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian D. Poppe on behalf of Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. (Poppe, Christian) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by 3rd Generation Engineering, Inc., Mark Fisher, filed. (Wood, Matthew) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/16/2025 at 04:45 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (bkt4)
|
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bkt4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bkt4) |
| Filing 4 Index of Matters Filed with Notice of Removal by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. (Sileo, Brett) |
| Filing 3 List of Counsel of Record by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. (Sileo, Brett) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Removal by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow, filed. (Sileo, Brett) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 127th District Court, case number 202475615 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32926631) filed by Critical Coordination, LLC, Tom Darrow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit Exhibit J) (Sileo, Brett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
