Curry v. Robertson Unit Doctor et al
Plaintiff: Tony Canandus Curry
Defendant: Montford Unit Xray Examiner, Gib Lewis Unit, 2004 Robertson Unit and Holiday Unit
Case Number: 4:2025cv01812
Filed: April 21, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Charles Eskridge
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2025 RECEIPT of Transfer Letter re: transfer of case to Northern District of Texas. New Case # assigned: 5:25-cv-00128 and received on 6/16/2025., filed. (bkt4)
June 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
June 10, 2025 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ON TRANSFER re: This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
June 10, 2025 Intradistrict Transfer to Lubbock Division, filed. (jmg4)
May 12, 2025 Filing 4 INCOMPLETE CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Tony Canandus Curry, filed. (dah4)
April 22, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmn4)
April 22, 2025 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4)
April 22, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4)
April 21, 2025 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Tony Canandus Curry. (bmn4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curry v. Robertson Unit Doctor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Canandus Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montford Unit Xray Examiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gib Lewis Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2004 Robertson Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holiday Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?