Valentinis v. Doolittle
| James Valentinis |
| Wesley Doolittle |
| 4:2025cv02110 |
| May 9, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE MOTION FOR 59(E), 60". Valentinis-Dee's "Miscarriage of Justice Motion for 59(e), 60," (Dkt. #13 ), is DENIED. No certificate of appealability will be issued. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT to petition by James Valentinis, filed. (bsg4) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Establish Miscarriage of Justice by James Valentinis, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/3/2025. (amp4) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING "MOTION FOR DEFAULT RULING". Petitioner James Valentinis-Dee, (Inmate# 553045), is a Texas state pretrial detainee. He filed a rambling pleading that this Court treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. (Dkt. #3 ). The Court dismissed the petition on May 15, 2025. (Dkts. #7 , #8 ). Valentinis-Dee has now filed another rambling document in which he "seeks [a] default ruling concerning claims." (Dkt. #11 ). Thismotion is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Entry Evid. FRCP403ca by James Valentinis, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/30/2025. (bmn4) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING "MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT". Valentinis-Dee's "Motion for Oral Argument," (Dkt. #9 ), is construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e), and is DENIED. No certificate ofappealability will be issued. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Oral Argument Brief by James Valentinis, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/23/2025. (anc4) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this date, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Case terminated on 05/15/2025. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Valentinis-Dee's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 (Dkt. #3 ), is DISMISSED without prejudice to him seeking relief in the appropriate forum. Any pending motions are DENIED as moot. Final judgment will be separate entered. No certificate of appealability will be issued. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
| Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bkt4) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from Texas Northern. Case Number 3:25-cv-00978; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bkt4) |
|
Filing 4
Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Houston Division of Southern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 5/7/2025) (axm)
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Valentinis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Rutherford (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Apr 18 14:31:40 CDT 2025 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valentinis v. Doolittle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Valentinis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Wesley Doolittle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
