Collins v. Unfin, Inc et al
| Bridget Collins |
| Unfin, Inc and First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC |
| 4:2025cv03405 |
| July 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Order of Dismissal with prejudice by Bridget Collins, First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC, Unfin, Inc, filed. (bkt4) |
Filing 15
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 10/24/2025 (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (glk4)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by defts Unfin, Inc, et al filed. (Homes, Justin) Modified on 10/22/2025 (cmk4). |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC, filed. (Homes, Justin) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Unfin, Inc, filed. (Homes, Justin) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for All Defendants.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (aar4)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC, Unfin, Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/7/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Homes, Justin) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed as to First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC served on 8/27/2025 via Certified Mail, answer due 9/17/2025, filed. (amp4) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed as to Unfin, Inc by certified mail, served on 8/27/2025, answer due 9/17/2025, filed. (amp4) |
| Complaint and Summons forwarded along with USM 285 to the Marshal for service, filed. (th4) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to First Portfolio Ventures II, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed. (bmn4) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Unfin, Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed. (bmn4) |
| Summons Not Issued as to All Defendants due to these deficiencies: Only one party may be listed for service per summons. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by First-class mail, filed. (jlm4) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jlm4) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/31/2025 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified. (jlm4)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (jlm4) |
| Filing 2 ***Docketed in error*** CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 8/22/2025, filed. Notice and blank Summons mailed to plaintiff via regular mail. (jlm4) Modified on 7/24/2025 (jlm4). |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (jlm4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Bridget Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) APPLICATION FOR IFP GRANTED BY JUDGE HANKS ON 7/22/2025 (jlm4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
