Stringfellow v. State of Texas et al
Petitioner: Steven J. Stringfellow
Respondent: State of Texas, Lee Romero and Montgomery County Court at Law 4
Case Number: 4:2025cv04864
Filed: October 10, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons stated in this court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 10/14/2025. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
October 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Stringfellow's federal habeas petition is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. An order of dismissal is separately entered. A certificate of appealability will not be issued. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
October 10, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (smg4)
October 10, 2025 Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (smg4)
October 10, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION for Electronic Filing Access Privileges by Steven J. Stringfellow, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/31/2025. (smg4)
October 10, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Steven J. Stringfellow, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/31/2025. (smg4)
October 10, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Steven J. Stringfellow. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (smg4)
October 10, 2025 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (smg4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stringfellow v. State of Texas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven J. Stringfellow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lee Romero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Montgomery County Court at Law 4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?