Thompson v. Hitek Films LLC
| Nicholas Thompson |
| Hitek Films LLC and Does 1-25 Inclusive |
| 4:2025cv05596 |
| November 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition to #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Nicholas Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (jww4) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Out of Time. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified. (jww4)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER. Trial Term: January / February 2027. ETT: 4 Days. Jury. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/31/2026. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo) Parties notified. (clf4)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 2/18/2026. Appearances:Plaintiff's attorney did not appear. Pam Rea.(ERO:Yes), filed. (clf4) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Nicholas Thompson, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/2/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1, #2 Exhibit RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS, #3 Exhibit PROPOSED ORDER - RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS, #4 Proposed Order MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE - PROPOSED ORDER) (Pittman, John) |
| Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Hitek Films LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order) (Rea, Pam) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Nicholas Thompson, filed. (Pittman, John) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hitek Films LLC, filed. (Rea, Pam) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/18/2026 at 10:15 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo) Parties notified. (cak4)
|
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (cak4) |
|
Filing 4
****DOCKETED IN ERROR*** ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/18/2025 at 10:15 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo) Parties notified. (cak4)
|
| Filing 3 ****DOCKETED IN ERROR*** CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (cak4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (cak4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Hitek Films, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/11/2025. (Rea, Pam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-34551426) filed by Hitek Films, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's State Court Petition, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet for removal) (Rea, Pam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
