Hurtado v. Garcia et al
| Cesia Solano Hurtado |
| Joe Garcia, Carlo Jimenez, Bret Bradford, Tae D Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland |
| 4:2025cv06255 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER. The challenged detention having now concluded, no live claims remain in this action. This action is DISMISSED. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on 02/13/2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
Filing 11
OPINION AND ORDER ON DISMISSAL re: The motion by Respondents for summary judgment is GRANTED. Dkt. 9. The petition for writ of habeas corpus by Petitioner Cesia Solano Hurtado is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dkt 1. The motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Dkt 2. Any other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED, Case terminated on 02/13/2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition to #9 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, filed by Cesia Solano Hurtado. (mew4) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Bret Bradford, Merrick Garland, Carlo Jimenez, Tae D Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order) (Ren, Shawn) |
Filing 8
ORDER re: The deadline to show cause with a filing that establishes the propriety of Petitioner's continued detention is extended until January 30, 2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO #5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, filed by Bret Bradford, Merrick Garland, Carlo Jimenez, Tae D Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ren, Shawn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jimmy Anthony Rodriguez on behalf of Bret Bradford, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed. (Rodriguez, Jimmy) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Response due by 1/23/2026 (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bkt4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bkt4) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Initial Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 400017498, filed. (th4) |
| Filing 2 EMERGENCY Motion for Temporary Restraining Order( Motion Docket Date 1/12/2026.), and Preliminary Injunction by Cesia Solano Hurtado, filed. (th4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Cesia Solano Hurtado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Declaration, #4 Cover Letter) (th4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.