Centurion Financial, GP v. White et al
Plaintiff: Centurion Financial, GP
Defendant: David White, Sr., Samuel Chopko and LTP Consulting, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2026cv00400
Filed: January 19, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2026 Filing 18 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 8/10/2026 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett, filed. (svj4)
June 4, 2026 Filing 17 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 8/3/2026 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett, filed. (svj4)
May 20, 2026 Filing 16 REPLY in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, filed by Samuel Chopko, David White, Sr. (jen7)
May 12, 2026 Filing 15 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Centurion Financial, GP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (McZeal, Marcellous)
April 21, 2026 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David White Sr. and Samuel Chopko, filed. (bnb6)
April 21, 2026 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Electronicaly by Samuel Chopko, David White, Sr, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/12/2026. (bnb6)
April 21, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretail and Scheduling Conference, to Reset Related Rule 26(f) Deadlines and Request for Expedited Consideration by Samuel Chopko, David White, Sr, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/12/2026. (bnb6)
April 21, 2026 Filing 11 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Samuel Chopko, filed. (bnb6)
April 21, 2026 Filing 10 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by David White, Sr, filed. (bnb6)
April 21, 2026 Filing 9 Defendants David White Sr. and Samuel Chopko's Consolidated Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6), Motion for More Definite Statement Under Rule 12(e), and Motion to Strike Under Rule 12(f) re: #1 Complaint (Motion Docket Date 5/12/2026.) by Samuel Chopko, David White, Sr, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bnb6)
April 20, 2026 Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Samuel Chopko served on 4/3/2026, answer due 4/24/2026, filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Return on Defendant Mr. White) (McZeal, Marcellous)
April 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER of Non-Compliance and resetting Rule 16 Conference Initial Conference set for 6/11/2026 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (clf4)
March 18, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 4/22/2026 at 10:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett, filed. (svj4)
January 21, 2026 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Samuel Chopko, LTP Consulting, Inc., David White, Sr. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (mew4)
January 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/25/2026 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (smg4)
January 21, 2026 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (smg4)
January 21, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (smg4)
January 19, 2026 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons 2nd Def, #2 Supplement Summons 2nd Def) (McZeal, Marcellous)
January 19, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-34886363) filed by Centurion Financial, GP. (McZeal, Marcellous)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Centurion Financial, GP v. White et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Centurion Financial, GP
Represented By: Marcellous Scott McZeal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David White, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samuel Chopko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LTP Consulting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?