Martin v. Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC
| Sean Martin |
| Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC |
| 4:2026cv01744 |
| March 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC, filed. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Sean Martin re: #3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. (jrm2) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Sean Martin re: #2 Order for Initial Conference - Form, filed. The address was previously updated, and the order was re-noticed. (ndb3) |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC filed by Sean Martin. (mew4) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC filed by Sean Martin. Related document: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC. (mew4) (DOCKETED IN ERROR) Modified on 3/18/2026 (mew4). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC, filed. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (bow4) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/5/2026 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho) Parties notified. (bow4)
|
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bow4) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from In the County Civil Court at Law No.1, case number 1265685 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35232041) filed by Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Index of Matters Being Filed, #5 Counsel of Record) (Martin, Eugene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sean Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rent Recovery Solutions, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Justin Han |
| Represented By: | Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
