Sapp et al v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Nathaniel H. Sapp and Gladys T. Sapp
Defendant: Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2026cv01945
Filed: March 11, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2026 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, filed. (Robertson, John)
March 30, 2026 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gladys T. Sapp, Nathaniel H. Sapp, filed. (Moore, James)
March 30, 2026 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company served on 3/25/2026, answer due 4/15/2026, filed. (Moore, James)
March 12, 2026 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (bow4)
March 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for First-Party Insurance Property Damage Cases Arising from Disasters. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (anc4)
March 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/12/2026 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho) Parties notified. (anc4)
March 12, 2026 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (anc4)
March 12, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (anc4)
March 11, 2026 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company, filed. (Moore, James)
March 11, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35293725) filed by Nathaniel H. Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET) (Moore, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sapp et al v. Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel H. Sapp
Represented By: James Michael Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gladys T. Sapp
Represented By: James Michael Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tower Hill Prime Insurance Company
Represented By: John Andrew Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?