Hall v. Gonzalez
| Mark-Joshua Hall |
| Ed Gonzalez |
| 4:2026cv02170 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons stated in this court's Memorandum on Dismissal, this civil action is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 8/17/2026. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL. This case is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. To the extent is such necessary, a certificate of appealability is denied. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Mark-Joshua Hall, filed. (kcc2) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. Hall's inmate trust fund account statement shows that he is able to pay the filing fee. His application for leave to proceed without prepaying fees is denied #7 . Filing fee due by 7/29/2026..(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mark-Joshua Hall, filed. (rad6) |
| Filing 7 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark-Joshua Hall, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/11/2026. (rad6) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 6/8/2026, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bsg4) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Mark-Joshua Hall, filed. (var2) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Mark-Joshua Hall, filed. (ndb3) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (ndb3) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (cng4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (cng4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Mark-Joshua Hall. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits A, B, C, and D, #3 Envelope) (ndb3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. Gonzalez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Mark-Joshua Hall | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ed Gonzalez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
