Verch v. WHM Eye Associates, P.A.
| Marco Verch |
| WHM Eye Associates, P.A. doing business as Marr-Kirkland Eye Center |
| 4:2026cv02462 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nicholas J Ganjei |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Initial Conference set for 5/22/2026 at 11:00 a.m. is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (svj4) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Scheduling Order re: #9 JointDiscovery/Case Management Plan by Marco Verch, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order) (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by WHM Eye Associates, P.A., filed. (Beddingfield, Jana) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/22/2026 at 11:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (svj4)
|
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A. served on 4/7/2026, answer due 4/28/2026, filed. (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (hlc4) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (sew4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (sew4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A., filed. (Nguyen, Layla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WHM Eye Associates, P.A. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35430643) filed by Marco Verch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Certifiate of Registration, #3 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright) (Nguyen, Layla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Verch v. WHM Eye Associates, P.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marco Verch | |
| Represented By: | Layla Nguyen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WHM Eye Associates, P.A. doing business as Marr-Kirkland Eye Center | |
| Represented By: | Jana L Beddingfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.