Verch v. WHM Eye Associates, P.A.
Plaintiff: Marco Verch
Defendant: WHM Eye Associates, P.A. doing business as Marr-Kirkland Eye Center
Case Number: 4:2026cv02462
Filed: March 27, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Nicholas J Ganjei
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2026 Filing 12 CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Initial Conference set for 5/22/2026 at 11:00 a.m. is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (svj4)
May 21, 2026 Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla)
May 8, 2026 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Scheduling Order re: #9 JointDiscovery/Case Management Plan by Marco Verch, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Scheduling Order) (Nguyen, Layla)
May 8, 2026 Filing 9 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla)
May 5, 2026 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marco Verch, filed. (Nguyen, Layla)
April 29, 2026 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by WHM Eye Associates, P.A., filed. (Beddingfield, Jana)
April 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/22/2026 at 11:00 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (svj4)
April 8, 2026 Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A. served on 4/7/2026, answer due 4/28/2026, filed. (Nguyen, Layla)
March 31, 2026 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (hlc4)
March 30, 2026 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (sew4)
March 30, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (sew4)
March 27, 2026 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to WHM Eye Associates, P.A., filed. (Nguyen, Layla)
March 27, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WHM Eye Associates, P.A. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35430643) filed by Marco Verch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Certifiate of Registration, #3 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #4 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright) (Nguyen, Layla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verch v. WHM Eye Associates, P.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Verch
Represented By: Layla Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WHM Eye Associates, P.A. doing business as Marr-Kirkland Eye Center
Represented By: Jana L Beddingfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?