Miles v. Glen Chase Honeycutt
| Jesse Miles |
| Glen Chase Honeycutt doing business as Brothers Steel Buildings |
| 4:2026cv02529 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Glen Chase Honeycutt, filed. (Rapp, Megan) |
Filing 10
ORDER - Granting #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ; Answer due for Glen Chase Honeycutt 5/26/2026. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (sra4)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Glen Chase Honeycutt, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rapp, Megan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Rapp and Zach Mathis on behalf of Glen Chase Honeycutt, filed. (Rapp, Megan) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Glen Chase Honeycutt served on 4/13/2026, answer due 5/4/2026, filed. (Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Glen Chase Honeycutt. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (sew4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/26/2026 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (bow4)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bow4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bow4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Glen Chase Honeycutt d/b/a Brothers Steel Buildings, filed. (Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jesse Miles, filed. (Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glen Chase Honeycutt d/b/a Brothers Steel Buildings (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35448986) filed by Jesse Miles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Scalise, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miles v. Glen Chase Honeycutt | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jesse Miles | |
| Represented By: | Charles L Scalise |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Glen Chase Honeycutt doing business as Brothers Steel Buildings | |
| Represented By: | Megan Bibb Rapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
