Secure Matrix LLC v. Landrys, LLC
| Secure Matrix LLC |
| Landrys, LLC |
| 4:2026cv02568 |
| March 31, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
Order of Dismissal re: #22 Stipulation of Dismissal. Case Terminated. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (lre4)
|
| Filing 22 STIPULATION of Dismissal (JOINT) by Secure Matrix LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 21 CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION due to Dkt. #20 Notice of Settlement. Initial conference set for July 24, 2026 is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (rlw4) |
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION to Stay ALL DEADLINES AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Secure Matrix LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/12/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #18 Motion for Extension of Time. Finding good cause, the motion is GRANTED IN PART. The deadline to file the JDCMP is extended to July 23, 2026, which is the day before the initial conference. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho) Parties notified. (rlw4)
|
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan by Landrys, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/7/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Morico, Paul) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Secure Matrix LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 7/24/2026 at 10:30 AM in by video before Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho, filed. (rlw4) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Landrys, LLC, filed. (Morico, Paul) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Landrys, LLC, filed. (Morico, Paul) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Initial Complaint shall be extended by 31 days from May 1, 2026 to June 1, 2026. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (dm4)
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Matthew C Thompson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (dm4)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Matthew C. Thompson (Fee Paid: $100, receipt number ATXSDC-35600442) by Landrys, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/7/2026. (Thompson, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Landrys, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/1/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Morico, Paul) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul R. Morico on behalf of Landrys, LLC, filed. (Morico, Paul) |
Filing 8
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons (Patent Case). Initial Conference set for 7/10/2026 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho) Parties notified. (sew4)
|
| Filing 7 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (sew4) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Landrys, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (amp4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (sew4) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Secure Matrix LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Landrys, LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Secure Matrix LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Secure Matrix LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Landrys, LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35457614) filed by Secure Matrix LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Secure Matrix LLC v. Landrys, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Secure Matrix LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Landrys, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Curtis Thompson |
| Represented By: | Paul Richard Morico |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.