Jabarkhel v. Frink
Petitioner: Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel
Respondent: Martin Frink and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Case Number: 4:2026cv02594
Filed: March 30, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Nicholas J Ganjei
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 05/28/2026 (Signed by Judge Nicholas J Ganjei) Parties notified. (acw4)
May 4, 2026 Filing 8 Statement of Case Review by USA . The above-captioned matter was not charged, litigated, considered, or investigated by the USAO for the Southern District of Texas at any time from January 2025 through March 2026, filed. (Herring, Jimmie)
May 1, 2026 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Requiring Statement of Case Review re: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Parties notified, filed. (glc4)
April 24, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel, Martin Frink by Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel, filed. (Rizvi, Farha)
April 24, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Farha Rizvi on behalf of Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel, filed. (Rizvi, Farha)
April 1, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (ndb3)
April 1, 2026 Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, )
April 1, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (ndb3)
March 30, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (ndb3)
March 30, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel. (ndb3)
March 30, 2026 Habeas Filing fee: $5 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 400019536, filed. (bwl4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jabarkhel v. Frink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Muhammad Iqbal Jabarkhel
Represented By: Farha Butool Rizvi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Martin Frink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Represented By: Jimmie Curtis Herring, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?