Farris et al v. Nike, Inc. et al
| Sherry Farris and Raffinee Brooks |
| Nike, Inc., Nike Retail Services, Inc. and Jane/John Doe |
| 4:2026cv02898 |
| April 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Maloney, Karima) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Lena Silva on behalf of Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc., filed. (Silva, Lena) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Karima Maloney on behalf of Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc., filed. (Maloney, Karima) |
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER re: #5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (cjh4)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Agreed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference ( Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan due by 6/16/2026; Initial Conference set for 6/26/2026 at 08:45 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (cjh4)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jane/John Doe, Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc., filed. (Maloney, Karima) |
| Filing 9 Agreed MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/18/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Maloney, Karima) |
| Filing 8 First CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Raffinee Brooks, Sherry Farris, filed. (Hicks, Jamal) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Nike Retail Services, Inc. served on 5/15/2026, answer due 6/5/2026, filed. (Hicks, Jamal) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Nike, Inc. served on 5/15/2026, answer due 6/5/2026, filed. (Hicks, Jamal) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 6/1/2026 at 09:15 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (hlc4)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (hlc4) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Nike Retail Services, Inc., Nike, Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (mew4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (hlc4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Hicks, Jamal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35557798) filed by Sherry Farris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Hicks, Jamal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
