Millerborg v. Arbor rose at Porter, LLC, et al.
| CASEY MILLERBORG |
| ARBOR ROSE AT PORTER, LLC, ARBOR ROSE CAPITAL, LLC and BROADDUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC |
| 4:2026cv03301 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nicholas J Ganjei |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Arbor Rose Capital, LLC, Arbor Rose at Porter, LLC, filed. (Clark, Andrew) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Corrected Filing re: #12 Corrected MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Broaddus Construction, LLC, filed. (Irving, Stephen) |
| Filing 12 Corrected MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Broaddus Construction, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/22/2026. (Irving, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Arbor Rose Capital, LLC, Arbor Rose at Porter, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/22/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Clark, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Broaddus Construction, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/16/2026. (Irving, Stephen) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time; Answer due for Arbor Rose Capital, LLC and Arbor Rose at Porter, LLC by 5/29/2026.(Signed by Judge Nicholas J Ganjei) Parties notified. (acw4)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Arbor Rose Capital, LLC, Arbor Rose at Porter, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Clark, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Broaddus Construction, LLC served on 5/4/2026, answer due 5/26/2026, filed. (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Arbor Rose Capital, LLC served on 4/29/2026, answer due 5/20/2026, filed. (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Arbor Rose Capital, LLC, Arbor Rose at Porter, LLC, Broaddus Construction, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (jld4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/8/2026 at 01:00 PM by video before Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo) Parties notified. (hlc4)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (hlc4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (hlc4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Request for Issuance (Arbor Rose Capital, LLC), #2 Summons - Request for Issuance (Broaddus Construction, LLC)) (Calhoun, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35665506) filed by CASEY MILLERBORG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Calhoun, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.