CenturyLink Communications, LLC v. Skidmore et al
| CenturyLink Communications, LLC |
| Thomas Skidmore, Beth Skidmore and Union Pacific Corporation LLC |
| 4:2026cv03443 |
| April 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 9/22/2026. Joinder of Parties due by 8/21/2026 Pltf Expert Report due by 3/23/2027. Deft Expert Report due by 4/22/2027. Discovery due by 6/8/2027. Mediation due by 8/24/2027. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/8/2027. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/8/2027. Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/23/2027. Docket Call set for 11/16/2027 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 05/29/2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Beth Skidmore, Thomas Skidmore, Union Pacific Corporation LLC by CenturyLink Communications, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Thomas Skidmore served on 4/30/2026, answer due 6/29/2026, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Beth Skidmore served on 4/30/2026, answer due 6/29/2026, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by CenturyLink Communications, LLC, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/22/2026 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/22/2026 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re: The motion by Plaintiff CenturyLink Communications, LLC, for temporary restraining order is DENIED. Dkt 5. The motion by Defendant Union Pacific Corporation to dismiss this action under Rule 12(b)(6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dkt 13. It may be presented again, if desired, as a stand-alone motion, rather than as part of its response to the requested temporary restraining order. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Beth Skidmore, Thomas Skidmore. (Attachments: #1 Errata, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Smith, Sarah) |
| Filing 13 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Response to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Union Pacific Corporation LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1 and 2 combined) (Borrego, Mary) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to #5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by CenturyLink Communications, LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela C. Hicks, Mary D. Borrego, Bryon A. Rice on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation LLC, filed. (Borrego, Mary) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Defendants are ORDERED to respond to the motion by 5:00 p.m. on May 4, 2026. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Union Pacific Corporation LLC served on 4/30/2026, answer due 6/29/2026, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah R. Smith on behalf of Beth Skidmore, Thomas Skidmore, filed. (Smith, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (cak4) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Beth Skidmore, Thomas Skidmore, Union Pacific Corporation LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (bow4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (cak4) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by CenturyLink Communications, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Proposed Order) (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Beth Skidmore, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Thomas Skidmore, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Union Pacific Corporation LLC, filed. (Isgur, Seth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beth Skidmore, Thomas Skidmore, Union Pacific Corporation LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-35712494) filed by CenturyLink Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Isgur, Seth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
