Ricardo-Font v. Thompson
Petitioner: Richel Ricardo-Font
Respondent: Raymond Thompson
Case Number: 4:2026cv04005
Filed: May 18, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Charles Eskridge
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Standing Order re: Habeas Matters Concerning 8 USC 1225(B)(2)(A) (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (dek4)
June 10, 2026 Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (bli4)
June 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. A certificate of appealability is DENIED as unnecessary. Case terminated on 6/10/2026 (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (bli4)
June 5, 2026 Filing 6 Supplemental RESPONSE to #5 Order,,, filed by Richel Ricardo-Font. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (bow4)
May 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Served electronically on USAO per MOU.) Petitioner Richel Ricardo-Font may, within twenty days from entry of this Order, make a further filing with additional authorities or distinguishing facts not considered in the rulings cited above on prior dismissals. Absent a showing of distinguishing facts, the petition will be denied and this action dismissed with entry of final judgment. Petitioner may in the alternative voluntarily dismiss the petition. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (bli4)
May 19, 2026 Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, )
May 19, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (amp4)
May 19, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (amp4)
May 18, 2026 Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 400020747, filed. (mew4)
May 18, 2026 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Richel Ricardo-Font, filed. (amp4)
May 18, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Richel Ricardo-Font. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A-J) (amp4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/20/2026: #3 Cover Letter) (mew4).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ricardo-Font v. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richel Ricardo-Font
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raymond Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?