Ramos-Cruz v. Frink et al
| Ivan Osberto Ramos-Cruz |
| Martin L. Frink, Brett Bradford, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 4:2026cv04396 |
| June 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT. Case terminated on July 6, 2026. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (cjh4) |
| Filing 8 ADVISORY by Markwayne Mullin, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Karpati, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Respondents' MOTION for Summary Judgment and; The petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Ivan Osberto Ramos-Cruz #1 is GRANTED in part. Any other pending motions are DENIED as moot. The respondents are ORDERED to release Ivan Osberto Ramos-Cruz from custody, under conditions of release (if any) no more restrictive than those in place prior to the detention at issue in this case, within 24 hours of entry of this Order. The petitioner must be released in a public place within the Southern District of Texas, and the respondents must notify the petitioners counsel of the exact location and exact time of the petitioners release as soon as practicable and no less than three hours before his release. The respondents are ORDERED to return to the petitioner, at the time of his release from custody, any and all identification documents taken from him at the time of or during his detention. If the respondents seek to re-detain the petitioner during the pendency of his removal proceedings, they must provide notice to the petitioner and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge at which the government demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, that he is a flight risk or a danger to the community. The respondents similarly may not subject the petitioner to additional conditions of release without a similar hearing at which the government bears the burden of showing why new conditions are necessary. The parties are further ORDERED to CONFER and FILE a joint status report within five (5) days of the date of this Order, confirming that the petitioner has been released and indicating whether this case may be closed. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (cjh4)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition to #5 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Ivan Osberto Ramos-Cruz. (Mendez, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Markwayne Mullin, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7) (Karpati, Elizabeth) |
| NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Frances Karpati on behalf of Markwayne Mullin, filed. (Karpati, Elizabeth) |
| NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Frances Karpati on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, filed. (Karpati, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER. Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Served electronically on USAO per MOU.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified. (bli4)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bsg4) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36011477) filed by Ivan Osberto Ramos-Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) (Mendez, Matthew) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bsg4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
