MidFirst Bank v. Robinson
| MidFirst Bank |
| Robert Robinson |
| 4:2026cv04447 |
| June 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF REMAND. For the reasons stated in this court's order, this case is remanded to County Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas. Case terminated on 7/23/2026. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
Filing 9
ORDER on Remand granting #4 . For the reasons stated, this case is remanded. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference reset for 9/29/2026 at 09:30 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal, filed. (gmh4) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by MidFirst Bank, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) |
Filing 6
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Residential Mortgage Cases. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
Filing 5
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 8/18/2026 at 10:10 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand by MidFirst Bank, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Proposed Order) (Hopkins, Shelley) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelley L. Hopkins on behalf of MidFirst Bank, filed. (Hopkins, Shelley) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (sew4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (sew4) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County Court of Law #2, case number 1278424 ( Filing fee $ 405) filed by Robert Robinson. (cmk4) |
| Filing fee: $405 re: #1 Notice of Removal, receipt number 400021143, filed. (cmk4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MidFirst Bank v. Robinson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MidFirst Bank | |
| Represented By: | Shelley L. Hopkins |
| Represented By: | Rex Leroy Kesler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.