Hunter III v. Central Transport LLC et al
| Jonas Hunter III |
| Central Transport LLC and John Doe |
| 4:2026cv04548 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bow4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bow4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Central Transport LLC, filed. (Oppenheim, Roger) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand by Central Transport LLC, filed. (Oppenheim, Roger) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court 2, case number CV26-05-0187 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-36056903) filed by Central Transport LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Errata, #4 Exhibit) (Oppenheim, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
