Sha v. Mullin et al
| Shuying Sha |
| Markwayne Mullin, Joseph B. Edlow, Todd Blanche and Wallace Carroll |
| 4:2026cv04717 |
| June 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (anc4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Shuying Sha. (anc4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/15/2026: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (anc4). |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (anc4) |
| Confirmation of receipt of payment from Shuying Sha in the amount of $ 405 re: #1 Petition/Complaint for Writ of Mandamus. Receipt date: 6/15/2026. Receipt number 400021385. Purpose Description: Civil Filing Fee. (anc4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
