Andrus v. Guerrero
Petitioner: Charles Ray Andrus
Respondent: Eric Guerrero
Case Number: 4:2026cv04949
Filed: June 18, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2026 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 400022837, filed. (jhs4)
July 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #5 , #6 , #10 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; granting #9 Motion for Leave to File. The petitioner must submit $5.00 in the form of a money order or check issued by the prison unit on the petitioners behalf from funds found in his inmate trust fund account within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The petitioner may file an amended petition on the Courts form within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) (Attachments: #1 2254 form) Parties notified. (glc4)
July 14, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/4/2026. (dmm4)
July 14, 2026 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Petition by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/4/2026. (dmm4)
July 14, 2026 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (dmm4).
July 8, 2026 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. (sew4)
July 8, 2026 Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sew4)
June 25, 2026 Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/16/2026. (jen7)
June 25, 2026 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Charles Ray Andrus, filed. (jen7)
June 23, 2026 Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 7/23/2026, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bsg4)
June 23, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (dmm4)
June 23, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (dmm4)
June 18, 2026 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Charles Ray Andrus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (dmm4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrus v. Guerrero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Ray Andrus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Guerrero
Represented By: Tomee Morgan Heining
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?