CORNELIO ANGAMARCA v. MULLIN et al
| EDGAR CORNELIO ANGAMARCA |
| MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Attorney General TODD BLANCHE, David J Venturella, Brett A. Bradford and Warden of Houston Contract Detention Facility |
| 4:2026cv06432 |
| August 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36544186) filed by EDGAR CORNELIO ANGAMARCA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVERSHEET, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1- I-130 FROM 1989, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2- I-485 DECISION DATED NOVEMBER 15 2014, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 3- I-130 REVOCATION DATED APRIL 19 1991, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 4- IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER APPROVAL NOTICE DATED DECEMBER 8 2008, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT 5- I-130 APPROVAL NOTICE DATED MARCH 27 2014, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT 6- REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION I-485, #8 Exhibit EXHIBIT 7- I-290B NOTICE OF APPEAL USCIS RECEIPT, #9 Exhibit EXHIBIT 8- I-824 APPROVAL NOTICE, #10 Exhibit EXHIBIT 9- ICE LOCATOR, #11 Exhibit EXHIBIT 10- NOTICE TO APPEAR, #12 Exhibit EXHIBIT 11- AUTOMATED CASE INFORMATION) (Square, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
