Cruz Garay v. Warden et al
| Gary Williams Cruz Garay |
| Raymond Thompson, Acting Director, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 4:2026cv07202 |
| August 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bsg4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bsg4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Order to Show Cause as to FOR APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Gary Williams Cruz Garay, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Solis, Manuel) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36708321) filed by Gary Williams Cruz Garay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) (Solis, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
