MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A. v. SOFON BULK LTD.
| MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A. |
| SOFON BULK LTD. |
| 4:2026cv07393 |
| September 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Appointing Top Choix Security as Substitute Custodian granting #3 . (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting Motion and Authorizing the Issuance of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment granting #2 . (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (gmh4)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 12/4/2026 at 11:00 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (bwl4)
|
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bwl4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to SOFON BULK LTD., filed. (Georgantas, Dimitri) |
| Filing 3 Ex Parte MOTION for an Order Appointing Top Choix Security as Substitute Custodian by MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Georgantas, Dimitri) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment by MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PMAG, #2 Proposed Order Authoring the Issuance of PMAG) (Georgantas, Dimitri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOFON BULK LTD. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-36756172) filed by MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Charter Party (Redacted), #2 Affidavit Rule B Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Georgantas, Dimitri) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bwl4) |
| Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment Issued, filed. (gmh4) |
| Summons Issued as to SOFON BULK LTD. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed. (gmh4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A. v. SOFON BULK LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MAVE SHIPPING & TRADING S.A. | |
| Represented By: | Dimitri P. Georgantas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOFON BULK LTD. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
