Nieto Valdez v. Temple et al
| Santiago Gabriel Nieto Valdez |
| Dashun Larae Temple and MCH Transportation Co. |
| 4:2026cv07866 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by MCH Transportation Co., Dashun Larae Temple, filed. (Ross, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 125th District Court of Harris County, case number 2026-41180 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-36863491) filed by MCH Transportation Co.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Filings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Ex1 - Fed Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Ex2 - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit Ex3 - List of Parties & Counsel, #5 Exhibit Ex4A - Original Petition, #6 Exhibit Ex4B - Citation (MCH), #7 Exhibit Ex4C - Citation (Temple), #8 Exhibit Ex4D - Original Answer (Temple), #9 Exhibit Ex4E - Scheduling Order, #10 Exhibit Ex4F - Service Affidavit (Temple), #11 Exhibit Ex4G - Service Affidavit (MCH), #12 Exhibit Ex4H - Ps Certificate of Discovery, #13 Exhibit Ex4I - Original Answer (MCH), #14 Exhibit Ex5 - Texas SOS Proof of Service, #15 Exhibit Ex6 - UPS Tracking, #16 Exhibit Ex7 - Temple Consent to Removal) (Ross, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
