v. Acosta Ramirez
| Geovanni Daniel Acosta Ramirez |
| 4:2026cv09501 |
| October 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Deportation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Geovanni Daniel Acosta Ramirez, filed. (Alonso, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-37202801.) filed by Geovanni Daniel Acosta Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit VAWA Prima Facie, #3 Exhibit Advanced Parole Approval, #4 Exhibit EAD Approval) (Alonso, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: v. Acosta Ramirez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geovanni Daniel Acosta Ramirez | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Luis Alonso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
