Cardona-Blanco v. USA
Defendant: USA
Petitioner: Jose Rene Cardona-Blanco
Case Number: 5:2008cv00091
Filed: July 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County: Webb
Presiding Judge: Micaela Alvarez
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4 OPINION AND ORDER dismissing with prejudice Petitioner's 2 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Additionally, should Cardona seek one, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified. (dmorales)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cardona-Blanco v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Rene Cardona-Blanco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?