Cotulla Style Pit Bar B Q, Inc
| Cotulla Style Pit Bar B Q, Inc |
| 5:2009cv00014 |
| January 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office |
| Webb |
| George P. Kazen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER. For reasons stated in a Memorandum of even date, the Court VACATES the bankruptcy court's January 9, 2009, dismissal of Appellant's adversary hearing against the City of Laredo (See Adversary Dkt.No.5) The adversary proceeding is REMANDED to the bankruptcy court for further consideration. (Signed by Judge George P. Kazen) Parties notified. (dmorales)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cotulla Style Pit Bar B Q, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: Cotulla Style Pit Bar B Q, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Edward P Fahey, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
