Munoz v. Laredo Transit Management, Inc
Petitioner: Rosa E. Munoz
Respondent: Laredo Transit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2015cv00144
Filed: July 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Laredo Office
County: Webb
Presiding Judge: Guillermo R. Garcia
Presiding Judge: Diana Saldana
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 65 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Teamsters 34 are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(vcantu, 5)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Munoz v. Laredo Transit Management, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rosa E. Munoz
Represented By: Murray Edward Malakoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Laredo Transit Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?