Rodriguez v. Mangum et al
| Liliana E. Rodriguez |
| Rodney Earl Mangum and RJ Logistics |
| 5:2018cv00157 |
| October 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John A Kazen |
| Marina Garcia Marmolejo |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Rodney Earl Mangum, RJ Logistics, filed.(Lair, R) |
| Filing 4 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Rodney Earl Mangum, RJ Logistics, filed.(Lair, R) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Rodney Earl Mangum, RJ Logistics, filed.(Lair, R) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/8/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 2C before Magistrate Judge John A Kazen. (Signed by Magistrate Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified.(dmorales, 5)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Webb District Court, case number 2018CVA000951D1 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21138663) filed by RJ Logistics, Rodney Earl Mangum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Exhibit 2 - Copy of Documents Filed in State Court, #3 Exhibit 3 - Citation and Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit 4 - Register of Actions, #5 Exhibit 5 - List of Counsel of Record)(Lair, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
