Jimenez v. Tineo et al
Plaintiff: Margarita Jimenez
Defendant: Adrian Daniel Tineo and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Case Number: 5:2019cv00069
Filed: May 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John A Kazen
Referring Judge: Diana Saldana
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ON CLOSING DOCUMENTS. The Court ORDERS the parties to file closing documents (i.e., all stipulated dismissals pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 signed by counsel for all parties) no later than 8/30/2019. Additionally, the Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2019 at 11:00 a.m. is hereby CANCELED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (JessicaGRodriguez, 5)
July 16, 2019 Filing 9 ADVISORY by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed.(Aspy, Paul)
July 11, 2019 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed.(Aspy, Paul)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE AND DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2C before Magistrate Judge John A. Kazen. (Signed by Magistrate Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (JessicaGRodriguez, 5)
May 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE to Court that All Removal Documents Were Served on All Parties/Counsel by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed. (Aspy, Paul)
May 23, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Index of Matters Being Filed by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed. (Aspy, Paul)
May 23, 2019 Filing 4 List of All Counsel of Record by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed.(Aspy, Paul)
May 23, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed.(Aspy, Paul)
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo, filed.(Aspy, Paul)
May 22, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22479703) filed by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, Adrian Daniel Tineo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Aspy, Paul)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jimenez v. Tineo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margarita Jimenez
Represented By: August Charles Toudouze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adrian Daniel Tineo
Represented By: Paul Clark Aspy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Represented By: Paul Clark Aspy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?