Pena v. Pacheco
Blanca Beliz Pena |
Luis M Pacheco, C.R. ENGLAND, INC. and Luis M. Pacheco d/b/a Oblatos Express |
5:2020cv00195 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
John A Kazen |
Marina Garcia Marmolejo |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2021 at 10:00 AM is RESET to 1/28/2021 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge John A Kazen, filed. (JessicaGRodriguez, 5) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Luis M. Pacheco, filed.(Kasperitis, Patrick) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE AND DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2021 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge John A Kazen. (Signed by Magistrate Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (JessicaGRodriguez, 5) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal by C.R. ENGLAND, INC., filed.(Landivar, Krizia) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Removal by C.R. ENGLAND, INC., filed.(Landivar, Krizia) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 406th, case number 2020-CVA-000873D4 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25501524) filed by Luis M Pacheco. (Attachments: #1 Index of Matters Being Filed)(Kasperitis, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.