City of Laredo v. The United States of America, et al.
| CITY OF LAREDO |
| The UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. CUSTO, The United States of America, United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Troy Miller, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Border Patrol and Rodney S. Scott |
| 5:2021cv00072 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Diana Song Quiroga |
| Diana Saldana |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER The case has been DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the case. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(dmorales, 5)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Rodney S. Scott, The United States of America, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security, filed.(Cravens, Annalisa) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: #9 . It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff City of Laredo file a clarification of the particular claim or claims it asserts against Defendants. Plaintiff's clarification must be filed no later than August 6, 2021 at 12:00 PM. Failure to do so will preclude the Courts consideration of the Opposed Request for Emergency Hearing #9 . Further, if no clarification is filed, the briefing schedule set out in the Courts July 29, 2021 order #8 will remain in effect. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(vcantu, 5)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Emergency Hearing re: Application for a Temporary Restraining Order Hearing by City of Laredo, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/25/2021. (vcantu, 5) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants response brief is hereby EXTENDED to August 12, 2021. The deadline for Plaintiffs reply brief is hereby EXTENDED to August 19, 2021.(Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(RobertTenorio, 5)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining OrderMotions referred to Diana Song Quiroga. by Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Rodney S. Scott, The United States of America, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cravens, Annalisa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants response brief is hereby EXTENDED to August 2, 2021. The deadline for Plaintiffs reply brief is hereby EXTENDED to August 9, 2021. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(RobertTenorio, 5)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining OrderMotions referred to Diana Song Quiroga. by Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Troy Miller, Rodney S. Scott, The United States of America, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of Border Patrol, United States Department of Homeland Security, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cravens, Annalisa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to serve Defendants with its #1 Complaint on or before July 21, 2021. Further, Defendants are hereby ORDERED to file their response briefs by July 26, 2021 regarding: (1) Plaintiffs standing to sue; and (2) Plaintiffs request for a TRO. Finally, Plaintiff will have until July 29, 2021 to file a reply brief. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified.(dmorales, 5)
|
| Confirmation of receipt of payment from City Of Laredo in the amount of $ 402 re: #1 Complaint,,. Receipt date: 7/19/21. Receipt number LAR019021. Purpose Description: Civil Filing Fee Non-prisoner. (RaulGamas, 5) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons filed by CITY OF LAREDO. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(vcantu, 5) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED ORDER, filed.(vcantu, 5) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Emergency Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, and Permanent Injunction and Request for Emergency Hearing on Temporary Restraining order against The UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECION; TROY MILLER, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Custom and Border Protection filed, by CITY OF LAREDO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(vcantu, 5) |
| Summons Issued as to The UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity; U.S. CUSTOMS, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff in person, filed.(vcantu, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
