Mojica v. Tovar et al
| Miguel A. Mojica |
| Carlos Uvalle Tovar and Transportes Zampe S De RL DE CV |
| 5:2021cv00118 |
| September 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Diana Song Quiroga |
| Diana Saldana |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Miguel A. Mojica, filed.(Martinez, Edwardo) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to Amended Pleadings due by 8/5/2022. Deadline for Joinder of Parties due by 12/10/2021 Deadline for Pltf to Designate Expert Witness List due by 5/6/2022. Deadline for Deft to Designate Expert Witness List due by 6/3/2022. Deadline to Complete all Discovery due by 9/2/2022. Deadline to Opt into Court Mediation due by 4/5/2022. Deadline to Complete ADR due by 9/15/2022. Deadline to File Dispositive Motions due by 10/7/2022.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga) Parties notified.(RobertTenorio, 5)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Miguel A. Mojica, filed. (Martinez, Edwardo) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga. Scheduling Conference held on 11/9/2021. Plaintiff appeared via Zoom through counsel David Martinez, and Defendants appeared via Zoom through counsel Tamara Rodriguez. The Court held a scheduling conference. Parties have exchanged initial disclosures. In their Joint Report, the parties sought to significantly extend the joinder deadline, although at the conference they were uncertain whether such a significant extension was necessary. The parties asked for a shorter extension, and the Court agreed to extend the joinder deadline to December 10. The Court reviewed the proposed scheduling order, and agreed to enlarge deadlines accordingly. Plaintiffs clarified that while Andrew Toscano is listed as counsel of record, David Martinez is the sole counsel representing Plaintiffs in this case. Plaintiffs will correct their filings accordingly. The Court advised the parties that they should confer in good faith before filing non-dispositive motions, and notify the Court if they reach a settlement. The Court will issue a scheduling order with dates agreed upon by the parties. Appearances: Attorney David Martinez f/PLAINTIFF; Attorney Tamara Rodriguez f/DEFENDANTs. (10:15 a.m.10:37 a.m.) (ERO: Danya Garza) (Filed, sgoldwasser, 5). |
| Filing 5 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Carlos Uvalle Tovar, Transportes Zampe S De RL DE CV, filed.(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/9/2021 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga) Parties notified.(vcantu, 5)
|
| Filing 3 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Carlos Uvalle Tovar, Transportes Zampe S De RL DE CV, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Carlos Uvalle Tovar, Transportes Zampe S De RL DE CV, filed.(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 341st Webb County, case number 2021cva001183d3 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27076925) filed by Transportes Zampe S De RL DE CV, Carlos Uvalle Tovar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
