Velasquez v. Laredo, Texas et al
Plaintiff: Alphonse Velasquez
Defendant: City of Laredo, Texas, Miguel A. Rodriguez, Jr., Miguel A. Herrero, Jose A. Alcazar, Jose Sotelo, Jose Garza, Maria Leonor Rodriguez and Nestor Vega-Reyes
Case Number: 5:2026cv00639
Filed: April 10, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Marina Garcia Marmolejo
Referring Judge: Diana Song Quiroga
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2026 Filing 13 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 12 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (rlt5)
May 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Granting #6 MOTION Motion for Leave to Register as a Pro Se Electronic Filer. As an initial matter, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Register as a Pro Se Electronic Filer, Dkt. No. 6, is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to grant Plaintiff access to the electronic filing system so that he may file motions and be notified of court activity in this case. Plaintiff is reminded that this access shall be used only to facilitate his efficient prosecution of his case; any abuse of electronic filing access may lead to loss of that privilege and other sanctions.Additionally, Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve Defendants with a summons and a copy of the Complaint by certified mail and file proof of this service by July 9, 2026. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If Plaintiff is unable to timely effectuate service, he is ORDERED to file an advisorynotifying the Court for the reason for the delay and showing good cause for the delay by July 9,2026. See id.Under the Local Rules for the Southern District of Texas, parties are not to file discoverymaterial with the Court. S. Dist. Tex. L.R. 5.4. Accordingly, Plaintiffs First Request forProduction of Documents to Defendant City of Laredo, Dkt. No. 4, and Plaintiffs First Set ofInterrogatories to Defendant City of Laredo, DKt. No. 7, are STRICKEN from the docket.Plaintiff may exchange discovery requests directly with Defendants once they have appeared inthe case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga) Parties notified. (rlt5)
April 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga. (Signed by Judge Marina Garcia Marmolejo) Parties notified. (rlt5)
April 13, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of Errata re: #4 MOTION for Discovery, #3 Declaration by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. (rlt5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 7 Plaintiff's First set of Interrogatories to Defendant City of Laredo by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 6 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Register as a Pro Se Electronic Filer by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/1/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 5 Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant City of Laredo by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. (tat5) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/10/2026) (tat5).
April 10, 2026 Filing 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/1/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Alphonse Velasquez in support of Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction on Shortened Notice re: #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, filed. (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 2 Plaintiff's Ex-Parte Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction on Shortened Notice Pursuant to Fed. R. CIV. P. 65 by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/1/2026. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit) (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jose A. Alcazar, Jose Garza, Miguel A. Herrero, City of Laredo, Texas, Maria Leonor Rodriguez, Miguel A. Rodriguez, Jr, Jose Sotelo, Nestor Vega-Reyes filed by Alphonse Velasquez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment) (tat5)
April 10, 2026 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (tat5)
April 10, 2026 ***Civil filing fee paid, Receipt #500001943 as to Alfonse Velazquez, filed. (bm5)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Velasquez v. Laredo, Texas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alphonse Velasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Laredo, Texas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel A. Rodriguez, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miguel A. Herrero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose A. Alcazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Sotelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Garza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maria Leonor Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nestor Vega-Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?