Duong v. Rio Grande Detention Center
| Xuan Duc Duong |
| Rio Grande Detention Center and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 5:2026cv01207 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Diana Saldana |
| Christopher dos Santos |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER. Accordingly, Petitioners petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. Respondents Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. 12), is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (jb5)
|
| Filing 14 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 07/10/2026 re: 13 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (rlt5) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed. Motions referred to Christopher dos Santos. Motion Docket Date 7/30/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Immigration Judge's Removal Order, #2 Exhibit EOIR Case Status page, #3 Proposed Order) (bnb6) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Intervene.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos) Parties notified. (bnb6)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Intervene by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed. Motions referred to Christopher dos Santos. Motion Docket Date 7/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Exhibit 2 - Immigration Judge's Removal Order, #3 Exhibit 3 - EOIR Case Status Page, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion to Intervene) (Drootman, Eric) |
| NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric Joel Drootman on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed. (Drootman, Eric) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO ANSWER. Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Served electronically on USAO per MOU.) Responses due by 7/14/2026. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) (Attachments: #1 (DE #1 Petition)) Parties notified. (var2)
|
|
Filing 6
***DOCKETED IN ERROR***ORDER In light of the Fifth Circuit's recent decision, the Court ORDERS Respondents to file supplemental briefing by July 10, 2026, addressing what effect, if any, Sosnava Rodriguez has on each of the claims raised in Petitioners habeas petition. Petitioner may file a reply to Respondents' briefing on or before July 31, 2026. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (ges5) Modified on 7/8/2026 (ges5).
|
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Filing Fee Due for filing of a case. Parties notified. (djm5) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (djm5) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (djm5)
|
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos randomly selected to receive referrals. An order or notice of referral of case or motion to follow. (djm5) |
| Filing Fee Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 500002325, filed. (eg5) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Xuan Duc Duong. (Attachments: #1 Restricted Attachment, #2 Envelope) (djm5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
