Singh v. Rio Grande Detention Center et al
| Yadwinder Singh |
| Warden Rio Grande Detention Center, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, TODD BLANCHE, Acting U.S. Attorney General and San Antonio Field Office Director |
| 5:2026cv01384 |
| August 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John A Kazen |
| Christopher dos Santos |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos. (Signed by Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (clr5)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (clr5) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36530957) filed by Yadwinder Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1- Paroled Stamp; Ex 2- Detainee Locator; Ex 3- Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Order Show Cause Order) (Kaur, Rupinder) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos randomly selected to receive referrals. An order or notice of referral of case or motion to follow. (clr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
