Velazquez Roblero v. MULLIN et al
| MARKWAYNE MULLIN, DAVID COLE, in his official capacity as Warden of the Rio Grande Processing Center and Acting Director EOIR Sirce Owen |
| Octavio Velazquez Roblero |
| 5:2026cv01541 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Brian C Bajew |
| Diana Saldana |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Brian C. Bajew. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (clr5)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (clr5) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Shefer, Nera) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXSDC-36714498) filed by Octavio Velazquez Roblero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (Shefer, Nera) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Brian C. Bajew randomly selected to receive referrals. An order or notice of referral of case or motion to follow. (clr5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
