Velasquez v. City of Laredo, Texas et al
| Alphonse Velasquez |
| City of Laredo, Texas, Miguel A Rodriguez, Jr., Miguel A. Herrero, Jose A. Alcazar, Jose Oscar Sotelo, Jose Ignacio Garza, Jr., Maria Leonor Rodriguez and John Doe 1 (RM 1379) |
| 5:2026cv01611 |
| September 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Diana Song Quiroga |
| Diana Saldana |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge and Notice Regarding Electronic Service and Consent to NEF. Party notified, filed. (ges5) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga. (Signed by Judge Diana Saldana) Parties notified. (ges5)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for permission to file electronically via CM/ECF by Alphonse Velasquez, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/2/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (ges5) |
| Filing 1 PLAINTIFF's ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Alphonse Velasquez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ges5) Modified on 9/11/2026 (ges5). |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga randomly selected to receive referrals. An order or notice of referral of case or motion to follow. (ges5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
