Lopez Rodriguez v. Aleman et al
| Edgar Rufino Lopez Rodriguez |
| Javier Aleman, Rio Grande Detention Center, David J. Venturella, Miguel Vergara, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche, U.S. Department of Justice and San Antonio Field Office |
| 5:2026cv01623 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John A Kazen |
| Diana Song Quiroga |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice of Redaction Responsibilities and Privacy Protection. Parties notified, filed. (SDTX_CMECF_AutoDocket, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, with Notice Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. Party notified, filed. (mtl5) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga. (Signed by Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (mtl5)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Edgar Rufino Lopez Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope) (mtl5) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Diana Song Quiroga randomly selected to receive referrals. An order or notice of referral of case or motion to follow. (mtl5) |
| Filing Fee Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number 500002630, filed. (eg5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
