PNC Bank National Association v. T. ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC. et al
| PNC Bank National Association |
| T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. |
| Sugata Ghatak |
| 5:2026mc00005 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| John A Kazen |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RETURN of Service Executed as to c/o Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service Company on 6/3/25 re: Writ of Garnishment, filed. (aav5) |
Filing 2
ORDER Plaintiffs Application for Writ of Garnishment, (Dkt. No. 1), is GRANTED and the Court ORDERS that the Writ of Garnishment appended to this order shall issue. The Court further ORDERS that the amount of property or indebtedness to be garnished is $555,889.98; this total reflects the total judgment owed by Ghatak. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve the Writ of Garnishment on the Garnishee and Ghatak in accordance with Texas law. (Signed by Judge John A Kazen) Parties notified. (vm5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/15/2026: #1 Writ of Garnishment) (vm5).
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF GARNISHMENT/Other Miscellaneous Relief ( Filing fee $ 52 receipt number ATXSDC-35451157.) filed by PNC Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order) (Hankins, Landon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
