Perry v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
| Inez Perry |
| Minnesota Life Insurance Company |
| 6:2023cv00018 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David S Morales |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss #10 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Minnesota Life Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -6/2022 Letter, #2 Exhibit B-9/2022 Letter, #3 Proposed Order)(McComber, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Minnesota Life Insurance Company filed by Inez Perry.(arodriguez, 2) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to File first amended complaint. (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Inez Perry, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Pltf's 1st Amd Complaint)(Anderson, David) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Petition filed by Inez Perry. (Anderson, David) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Inez Perry, filed.(Anderson, David) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Minnesota Life Insurance Company, filed.(McComber, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Original Petition by Minnesota Life Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/29/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McComber, Ryan) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Pretrial & Scheduling Conference set for 6/7/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge David S Morales(Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)
|
| Filing 2 DESIGNATION of David M. Anderson as attorney in charge of Inez Perry, filed.(Anderson, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 267th District Court, Victoria County, Texas, case number 23-02-89428-C (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29536779) filed by Minnesota Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 Index of State Court Docs, #3 Exhibit 3 List of Parties and Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(McComber, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perry v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Inez Perry | |
| Represented By: | David M. Anderson, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Minnesota Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Kent McComber |
| Represented By: | Dwayne Isaiah Lewis, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
