Emrit v. Jules
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Sabine Aisha Jules |
| 6:2023cv00031 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Mitchel Neurock |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Assignment of USCA No. 23-40469 re: #7 Notice of Appeal, filed.(BrittanyBoniface, 6) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Non-Compliance. The appellant (or counsel for the appellant, if represented) has failed to: Submit the DKT13 transcript order form. Parties notified, filed. (LanaReimann, 6) |
| Filing 8 Clerks Notice of Filing of an Appeal. The following Notice of Appeal and related motions are pending in the District Court: #7 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: IFP, filed. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal) (BrittanyBoniface, 6) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL to US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit re: #6 Memorandum and Recommendations, by Ronald Satish Emrit, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(BrittanyBoniface, 6) |
| Appeal Review Notes re: #7 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: IFP. The appeal filing fee has been paid or an ifp motion has been granted.No hearings were held in the case - no transcripts. Number of DKT-13 Forms expected: 1, filed.(BrittanyBoniface, 6) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Complaint Objections to M&R due by 8/14/2023(Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock) Parties notified.(fcarbia, 2) Copy was mailed to Mr. Emrit today along with a USPS white card for receipt acknowledgement. |
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(BrittanyBoniface, 6)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER STRIKING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(NeldaGarcia, 2) copy sent along with white card. Modified on 7/14/2023 (NeldaGarcia, 2).
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrittanyBoniface, 6) |
| Filing 2 **STRICKEN by DE #4 **-MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint Objections to M&R due by 7/26/2023(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(MaraGonzales, 2) Modified on 7/14/2023 (NeldaGarcia, 2). Modified on 7/17/2023 (SylviaLopez, 2). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sabine Aisha Jules filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) . IFP granted in 6:23-MC-3 per Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton on 7/12/2023. (MaraGonzales, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Emrit v. Jules | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sabine Aisha Jules | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
