Sandoval v. Lumpkin et al
| Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr. |
| Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division |
| 6:2024cv00024 |
| August 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jason B Libby |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee as to Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr.; granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified. (var2)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (rad6) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (rad6) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr, filed. (rad6) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Jason B Libby. by Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/26/2024. (rad6) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Bobby Lumpkin, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division (Filing fee $ 405-not paid) filed by Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr. (Attachments: #1 2nd copy of complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (rad6) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
