Ceannt v. Pinkston
Plaintiff: Michael Ceannt
Defendant: Erik Christian Pinkston
Case Number: 7:2008cv00082
Filed: February 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office
County: Hidalgo
Presiding Judge: Ricardo H. Hinojosa
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S LETTER AND REFER MOTIONS TO TRIAL JUDGE 18 Notice of Barratry by the United States District Clerk for the Southern District of Texas.(Signed by Chief Judge Hayden Head) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ceannt v. Pinkston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Ceannt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erik Christian Pinkston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?